P. v. Strong
Defendant was convicted of embezzlement and grand theft. Defendant was placed on probation, ordered to spend 180 days in county jail, and ordered to pay restitution to the victims. Defendant appealed and Court affirmed the judgment. Defendant moved to modify the conditions of her probation by reducing the amount of restitution. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion. Defendant contends she was denied due process because the court did not issue a statement of decision giving its reasons for its decision. Court affirms because the trial court was not required to state reasons and its ruling was otherwise proper.
Comments on P. v. Strong