Universal-Products International v. Omega Products
Plaintiff and respondent Universal-Products International, LLC, (Universal) hired defendant Omega Products International, Inc. (Omega) to fabricate and test a pool resurfacing product. When the product began to reemulsify, or soften, Universal sued Omega for breach of contract and related claims. A jury found in favor of Universal and the court awarded a judgment for damages of $470,833. Omega appeals from the judgment.
Omega identifies five issues on appeal. The first two issues involve parol evidence and the agreement to test for reemulsification. Omega contends the trial court wrongly ruled that the testing agreement was not integrated and that Universal could present parol evidence about the meaning of the agreement. In the alternative, Omega contends that no substantial evidence proved the existence of a testing agreement.
Comments on Universal-Products International v. Omega Products