In re T.M. CA2/5
The mother, C.M., appeals from August 27, 2015 Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b) jurisdictional and dispositional orders. The mother is the great paternal aunt and adoptive mother of the child, T.M. The mother contends: the juvenile court erred by refusing to continue the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing, which she did not attend; she is entitled to have the jurisdictional order reversed because her counsel, Vincent Davis, acted ineffectively; Mr. Davis acted ineffectively because he failed to present any evidence at the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing; and it was error for the juvenile court to find that the mother’s preferred counsel, Joni Saloman, was not competent to provide representation during dependency proceedings. We affirm the jurisdictional and dispositional orders.
Comments on In re T.M. CA2/5