P. v. Luevanos CA2/8
Victor Luevanos and Juan Hernandez were convicted of second degree robbery with gang and firearm enhancements. On appeal, they argue that the prosecution introduced case-specific testimonial hearsay statements prohibited by our Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez). Luevanos also argues the trial court improperly denied his requests for a continuance made in conjunction with his motion to represent himself (Faretta motion). We find no reversible error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Luevanos CA2/8