P. v. Pena CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Aileen Marie Pena has filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) After reviewing the record, we discovered a discrepancy between the trial court’s oral pronouncement of judgment and the abstract of judgment with regard to fines. We shall order the trial court to correct the abstract of judgment to reflect the fines imposed. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Pena CA3