Hinds v. Nguyen CA4/3
It is well established that the primary function of an appellate court is to review the record of the trial court for errors of law. (Tupman v. Haberkern (1929) 208 Cal. 256, 262.) Consequently, we generally review “the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition, upon a record of matters which were before the trial court for its consideration.” (In re James V. (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 300, 304.)
Comments on Hinds v. Nguyen CA4/3