In re D.D. CA5
Appellant D.D., a minor, appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order following a true finding to a petition filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging appellant committed a robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). Appellant contends one of the conditions of his probation, limiting his right to leave Stanislaus County, is facially overbroad. Alternatively, appellant contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his counsel failed to object to the contested term. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Comments on In re D.D. CA5