legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Matthias A.
The court adjudged Appellant, a ward of the court, after Appellant admitted allegations charging him with possession of drug paraphernalia and tampering with a vehicle. The juvenile court ordered Appellant to serve 30 days on house arrest and attend substance abuse counseling. On appeal, Appellant contends the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress. Defense has the burden of raising the issue (illegal search and seizure) and the Prosecution has the burden of proving that it (warrantless search and seizure) was reasonable. There was no evidence to justify the detention. Court reverses.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale