In re R.M.
O.N. (mother) and Ro.M. (father), parents of the minor, R.M., appeal the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights. (Welf.& Inst. Code, §§ 366.26 & 395.)[1] They contend the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying their request for a continuance of the section 366.26 hearing, and erred in failing to apply the beneficial parental relationship exception to adoption.[2] (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) On the first contention, we conclude the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying the continuance request. On the second contention, we conclude the parents failed to establish the beneficial parental relationship exception applied. Thus, the juvenile court did not err in terminating parental rights. We affirm the juvenile court’s order.
Comments on In re R.M.