legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Dania L.
Simon G. (father) and Y.L. (mother) each separately appeal from an order terminatingparental rights. There are six children involved in this appeal: Dania L. (born June 2008); K.G. (born Oct. 2009); I.G. (born Mar. 2011); Simon G. (born Mar. 2012); Daphne G. (born Jan. 2013); and Silvia L. (born Jan. 2015).[1]
Father appeals from the order terminating his parental rights to Dania, K.G., I.G., Simon, and Daphne. He argues that he was not provided with adequate reunification services, and if adequate reunification services were provided, then the law is inadequate to protect the fundamental constitutional rights of parents.
Mother appeals from the order terminating her parental rights to Silvia. She argues that there was insufficient evidence supporting the juvenile court’s finding that Silvia was adoptable. Mother argues that the order terminating her parental rights as to Silvia must be reversed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale