Rosenberg v. Avila
Yacov Avila appeals from a restraining order issued pursuant to California’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.) (the DVPA).[1] He contends the affidavit and testimony of the petitioner, Leah Rosenberg, did not constitute reasonable proof of abuse under the DVPA because Rosenberg was, in Avila’s assessment, “simply not credible.” We conclude the trial court’s credibility determinations and factual findings were reasonable in view of the evidence presented. We affirm.
Comments on Rosenberg v. Avila