P. v. Martin
Malcolm James Martin (defendant) appeals his conviction for first degree burglary. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues. On December 12, 2016, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file, within 30 days, his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. That time has elapsed, and defendant has submitted no brief or letter. We have reviewed the entire record, and finding no arguable issues, affirm the judgment.
The prosecution evidence established that in the early morning hours of September 18, 2015, police were called to a residence to investigate a possible break-in. When the first officer arrived he observed defendant and his accomplice inside the residence disconnecting cables, moving musical instruments around, removing speakers from a basement music studio, and then taking those speakers upstairs to the second floor. Whe
Comments on P. v. Martin