Larchmont Village Partners One v. City of Los Ange
Plaintiff, Larchmont Village Partners One LLC, appeals from a June 25, 2015 judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure[1] sections 583.310 and 583.360, subdivision (a). Plaintiff contends Judge Stephanie M. Bowick erred in granting the dismissal motion of defendant, City of Los Angeles, because the case was not tried within five years after it was filed. Plaintiff argues the five-year provision of section 583.310 is inapplicable because Judge Soussan G. Bruguera granted defendant’s judgment on the pleadings motionwithout leave to amend on January 30, 2013. We agree.
Plaintiff’s mandate petition and complaint was filed on February 26, 2010. The mandate petition and complaint consisted of claims: to set aside a revocation of a building permit and occupancy certificate for a restaurant; to cancel an instrument because of a cloud on the title; for violation of equal protection; and for violations of civil rights pursuant to title 42 United States Code sec
Comments on Larchmont Village Partners One v. City of Los Ange