P. v. Lee
We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reverse fourof the money laundering convictions based on insufficient evidence. We reverse the identity theft convictions because there is no evidence Lee used his victims’ personal identifying information for an unlawful purpose without their consent. We reverse two elder theft convictions because the Attorney General concedes there was insufficient evidence to support them. We conclude Lee should not have to pay restitution to one set of victims, and the trial court should amend the judgment to correct the amounts of certain fees. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Lee