P. v. Ens
Defendant appeals from his conviction for second degree murder and gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. Defendant contends (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior acts of drunk driving; (2) the jury instructions improperly blurred the distinction between vehicular manslaughter and gross vehicular manslaughter; (3) the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning a Florida drunk driving conviction and defendant's participation in a DWI school in Florida; (4) the admission of defendant's refusal to take a field sobriety test violated his Fifth Amendment rights; and (5) counsel was ineffective. Court affirmed the decision.
Comments on P. v. Ens