In re Isabel R.
In this dependency case involving Isabel R. (Isabel), Valerie C. (Valerie) and Ashley C. (Ashley) (collectively minors), T.R. (mother) appeals from the jurisdictional findings that she failed to protect Isabel within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d),[1] and as to Valerie and Ashley under subdivisions (b), (d) and (j). We find no error and affirm.
Comments on In re Isabel R.