P. v. Penn
Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary (Pen. Code,[1] § 459; count 1), and to resisting an officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)), and admitted a strike prior dating back to 2006 (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)). In return for defendant's guilty plea, the court struck the strike prior, sentenced defendant to 365 days of local time and granted defendant three years' probation.
On appeal, defendant objects to probation condition 6(n), which requires defendant "[s]ubmit person, vehicle, residence, property, personal effects, computers and recordable media . . . to search at any time with or without a warrant, and with or without reasonable cause, when required by [probation officer] or law enforcement officer." (Italics added.) Specifically, defendant challenges the italicized portion of condition 6(n) concerning computers and recordable media. He contends its imposition is unreasonable and violates his constitutional right to privacy because "[t]here was no evidence o
Comments on P. v. Penn