legal news


Register | Forgot Password

David M. v. Superior Court
Petitioner David M. (Father), the father of 19-month-old David M., Jr. (David, Jr.), challenges the Alameda County juvenile court’s February 1, 2016 order terminating family reunification services and setting a permanency hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (366.26 hearing), for May 26, 2016.[1] He contends there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that there was no substantial probability that David, Jr., would be returned to Father’s care if services were extended to the 18-month review date. For the reasons given below, we deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale