legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Salgado
Defendant Edie Lily Salgado appeals from an order reinstating and extending her probation. She contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to do so because her maximum probationary term had already expired. Alternatively, she argues her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the extension as an act in excess of the court’s jurisdiction.
The People concede the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extend Salgado’s probation, and we agree the concession is appropriate.[1]
We will therefore reverse the trial court’s order reinstating probation and direct the trial court to discharge Salgado from probation.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale