P. v. Reyes
We appointed counsel to represent Edward James Reyes on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against his client but advised the court no issues were found to argue on his behalf. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), to assist the court with its independent review, counsel provided the court with information as to issues that might arguably support an appeal. Counsel provided information on the following three issues: (1) whether Reyes’s convictions were supported by substantial evidence; (2) whether the accomplice testimony was sufficiently corroborated; and (3) whether Reyes was prejudiced by gang expert testimony.
Counsel advised Reyes he may personally file a supplemental brief. Reyes was given 30 days to file a supplemental brief. That time has passed, and he did not file a supplemental brief. We have reviewed the information provided by counsel and we have independently examined the record. We found no arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Reyes