In re Alexis M.
Christina D. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her child, Alexis M. (child), now five years old, and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[1] Mother argues that her counsel was ineffective because he failed to present an offer of proof as to the beneficial relationship exception to the termination of parental rights. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) We affirm.
Comments on In re Alexis M.