Kahn v. Dillon
These appeals are from an order granting in part and denying in part a special motion to strike Carl Kahn's claims against Timothy P. Dillon and his law firm, Dillon & Gerardi, APC (collectively Dillon), for malicious prosecution and abuse of process based on Dillon's representation of a client in a prior action against Carl and his sister Margaret Kahn.[1] Carl appeals the portion of the order striking the abuse of process claim, and Dillon appeals the portion refusing to strike the malicious prosecution claim. We affirm.
Comments on Kahn v. Dillon