P. v. Nava
Defendant Rogelio Nava appeals from the judgment entered following the trial court’s finding that he violated the terms and conditions of probation. He contends the court erred by ordering him to pay restitution to a victim and failing to either impose or strike a sentence for an enhancement. The Attorney General agrees with defendant and also requests that we order the abstract of judgment amended to reflect the imposition of mandatory fines. We will vacate the restitution order and direct the superior court to correct the abstract of judgment.
Comments on P. v. Nava