P. v. Spoonmore
This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we note defendant Richard Lee Spoonmore[1] is entitled to presentence credit and shall affirm the judgment as modified. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
Comments on P. v. Spoonmore