legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.F.
The minor, D.F., admitted committing first degree burglary, conspiracy to commit burglary, vandalism, possession of burglary tools, and misdemeanor assault. The juvenile court placed the minor on deferred entry of judgment (DEJ), but subsequently found that the minor violated the terms of his DEJ. At the dispositional hearing, the juvenile court adjudged the minor a ward of the court and placed him on probation subject to various conditions, including 60 days in juvenile hall with 30 days of credit.
The minor now contends (1) the juvenile court erred in refusing to hold a hearing on whether DEJ should have been revoked, (2) denial of the hearing violated various constitutional provisions, and (3) there is an error in the disposition order.
We conclude (1) the juvenile court held a hearing when it revoked DEJ, (2) the hearing complied with federal and state constitutional provisions, and (3) the disposition order -- the juvenile detention disposition report -- must be corrected.
We will order a correction to the disposition order and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale