In re A.J.
Appellant Ar.J., father of the minors A.J. and An.J., appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 360, subd. (d), 395.)[1] He contends the juvenile court improperly denied reunification services based on a flawed finding of severe sexual abuse. Ample evidence of severe sexual abuse was presented at the jurisdictional hearing and the juvenile court correctly relied on this evidence in making its dispositional findings and orders. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re A.J.