In re J.O.
S.J. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights to her son, J.O., based on her failure to reunify with him or establish that she had developed a beneficial parental relationship with him, the termination of which would be detrimental to him. We hold that because there was insufficient evidence to show that mother had developed a beneficial relationship with J.O., and because the juvenile court acted within its discretion in concluding that termination would not be detrimental to J.O., the court did not err in terminating mother’s parental rights. We therefore affirm the order terminating parental rights.
Comments on In re J.O.