legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.C.
Defendant L.C. appeals the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. After defendant filed a timely notice of appeal, appellate counsel was appointed to represent him. Appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) (see Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders)), in which he raises no issue for appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record. (See also People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 124 (Kelly).) Counsel attests that defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief. We have received no such brief.
We have examined the entire record in accordance with Wende. We conclude that no arguable issue exists on appeal and affirm.
On July 3, 2012, the Contra Costa County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition (§ 602) charging defendant with one felony count of first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459/460, subd. (a)). On July 10, 2012, defendant entered a no contest plea to an amended count of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459/460, subd. (b)). At the dispositional hearing held on July 24, 2012, the juvenile court adjudged defendant a ward, ordered him to complete a six-month program at the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility (OAYRF), and imposed various terms and conditions of wardship.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale