In re R.S.
Michael S. (father) appeals from a dispositional order made pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361, subdivision (c)(1),[1] removing his children from his custody and placing them with their paternal grandmother. Father does not contest the dependency court’s finding of jurisdiction under section 360, subdivisions (b) and (c), acknowledging there “may have been sufficient evidence to support dependency jurisdiction.”[2] Rather, he contends the evidence was insufficient to additionally support the removal order. We affirm.

Comments on In re R.S.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced