P. v. Hurth
These consolidated appeals arise from defendant Maurice P. Hurth’s conviction of felony vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a)).[1] In appeal No. A135072, he contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying a mistrial after the victim, Hanif Adisa, in violation of an in limine ruling, briefly alluded in his testimony to defendant’s alleged commission of an unrelated “home invasion.†In appeal No. A137357, Hurth contends the trial court abused its discretion in the amount of restitution ordered following revocation of his probation and sentencing. We conclude there was no abuse of discretion and affirm defendant’s conviction and the restitution order.
Comments on P. v. Hurth