legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Brooklyn L.
Appellant Julio L. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders establishing dependency jurisdiction over his daughter Brooklyn (born May 2010) and placing her in foster care. Father contends substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)[1], that father hit mother in Brooklyn’s presence or that past instances of domestic violence placed Brooklyn at current substantial risk of harm. Father further contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by not placing Brooklyn in his care or by according him unmonitored visitation. We affirm the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders but remand the matter to the juvenile court with directions to amend count b-2 in the section 300 petition to conform to proof, as set forth in our disposition, infra.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale