In re M.D.
Sixteen-year-old M.D. (the minor) appeals from juvenile court orders finding that he committed felony robbery and placing him on probation. He contends that there is no evidence of force to support the robbery finding and that certain terms of his probation incorporated in the judgment differ from those imposed by the court and are unconstitutional, unreasonable, or vague. We affirm the robbery finding but agree, as does the Attorney General, that the challenged probation conditions must be modified to conform to the juvenile court’s oral pronouncements.
Comments on In re M.D.