P. v. Kelly
Jerome Eugene Kelly appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of kidnapping to commit a sex offense, sodomy by force, forcible oral copulation, kidnapping, and sodomy by force, and found true movement of the victim and multiple victim enhancements. Kelly argues the trial court erred in admitting evidence, instructing the jury, and sentencing him. We agree Kelly’s sentencing claim has merit. None of his other contentions have merit, and we affirm the judgment as modified.
Comments on P. v. Kelly