legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Clara M.
Marina F. (mother) appeals from a 2013 order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26)[1] to her 14-year-old daughter, Clara. After reviewing the entire record, mother’s court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court he could find no arguable issues to raise on mother’s behalf. Counsel requested and this court granted leave for mother to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error does exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
After the time to file a letter brief expired, this court received a photocopy of a letter apparently from mother in which she asks to regain custody of Clara. According to the letter, mother is “doing what [the] judge ordered.” The letter also claims Clara is suffering and needs mother. On review, we conclude the letter does not amount to a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error does exist. (In re Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale