P. v. Greenwood
This case arises out of defendant Stuart Alden Greenwood, a chiropractor, committing sexual crimes against his female patients while leading them to believe he was providing them with chiropractic treatment. Defendant appeals from judgment entered following jury convictions for two counts of foreign object penetration by means of a fraudulent professional purpose (Pen. Code, § 289, subd. (d)(4);[1] counts 1 and 5), three counts of sexual battery by means of a fraudulent professional purpose (§ 243.4, subd. (c); counts 2, 3, 4), and three counts of misdemeanor sexual battery (§ 243.4, subd. (e)(1); counts 6, 7, 8). The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate prison term of eight years.
Defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for foreign object penetration by means of a fraudulent professional purpose as to R.S. (count 1) and his conviction for sexual battery by means of a fraudulent professional purpose as to De.L. (count 8). Defendant also contends the trial court erred in giving CALCRIM No. 370 on motive.
Comments on P. v. Greenwood