legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McKim
In exchange for a stipulated sentence of 16 years four months, defendant Jason McKim pleaded no contest to two counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211 -- counts 1 & 2),[1] one count of vandalism (§ 594 -- count 3) and one count of resisting or obstructing a peace officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1) -- count 4). He also admitted a deadly weapon enhancement as to the second robbery charge (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)), two prior serious felony enhancements (§§ 667, subds. (a)(1), (c), (e)(1), 1192.7) and a prior prison term enhancement (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). Defendant contends the imposition of a one-year term for the deadly weapon enhancement was unauthorized because it violates the requirements of section 1170.1. We find the court improperly designated count 1 as the principal term. This error requires the abstract of judgment be amended.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale