legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Rhodes v. Decker Bullock Realty
This appeal arises from an action involving a sale of real property. The buyer of the property, Marion Hill, sued the sellers, appellants Jesse and Brenda Rhodes,[1] and the sellers’ agents, respondents Decker Bullock Realty, Inc., William Bullock, and Lydia Sarkissian (collectively DBR), claiming the Rhodes and DBR had failed to make adequate disclosures in connection with the sale of the property. Both Jesse and Brenda filed cross-complaints against DBR.
DBR and Hill eventually agreed to settle Hill’s claims for $150,000. DBR then moved for a determination of good faith settlement under Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6.[2] The trial court granted the motion over the Rhodeses’ opposition, and its order dismissed all pending cross-complaints against DBR.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale