Carrillo v. Woodford
Dustin M. Woodford appeals a restraining order prohibiting him from, among other conduct, possessing a firearm. Woodford contends the trial court abused its discretion by not granting him an exemption from that prohibition because he needs to carry a firearm as part of his job. He asks us to remand the matter to the trial court with directions to modify the restraining order to grant the exemption upon a proper evidentiary showing concerning his employment. We decline Woodford's request and dismiss his appeal as moot.
Comments on Carrillo v. Woodford