P. v. Arana
Claudia Munoz Arana appeals from a judgment convicting her of burglary arising from her participation in a theft of clothing from a store. She argues (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of her prior petty theft offense to show intent and common plan; (2) there is insufficient evidence to show she entered the store with intent to steal; and (3) the court erred in dismissing a juror as unfit to serve. We find no error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Arana