P. v. Arterberry
Defendant Rasheen Germain Arterberry appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury of second degree robbery and being a felon in possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12021, subd. (a)(1).)[1] The jury also found that during the commission of the robbery, defendant personally used a firearm and a principal was armed with a firearm. (§§ 12022.53, subd. (b), 12022, subd. (a)(1).) He alleges sentencing error and asks this court to conduct an independent review of the in camera hearing conducted pursuant to his Pitchess motion.[2]
Comments on P. v. Arterberry