P. v. Luu
Defendant Huy The Luu appeals from a judgment sentencing him to four years and four months in state prison following his admission of a probation violation. Defendant’s counsel has filed an opening brief in which no issues are raised and asks this court for an independent review of the record as required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel has declared that defendant was notified that no issues were being raised by counsel on appeal, and that an independent review under Wende was being requested. We notified defendant of his right to submit a written argument on his own behalf. Defendant has filed a supplemental letter brief arguing that the trial court violated his due process rights, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the trial court failed to provide him with documents.[1]
Comments on P. v. Luu