P. v. Wozniski
Defendant Dario Joseph Wozniski appeals a judgment following a jury trial during which he was convicted of five felony counts related to a sexual assault. On appeal, he asserts the trial court erred in his sentencing, because his conviction for attempted forcible oral copulation is a lesser included offense to assault with intent to commit oral copulation by force or fear or sexual penetration by force or fear. (Penal Code, §§ 220, 21a, 288a, subd. (c)(2).)[1]
Comments on P. v. Wozniski