Farace v. Feher
The trial court in this commercial fraud case found the defendant, a licensed real estate broker, actively concealed from the plaintiff material information with respect to financing the defendant obtained from the plaintiff for a gas station and convenience store in Coachella, California. The trial court awarded the plaintiff $260,000.
On appeal, the defendant argues the trial court's decision is not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm. Among other findings, the trial court determined that the plaintiff was credible; that his testimony was corroborated by correspondence between the parties; and that, with respect to critical issues, the defendant's testimony was contradicted by that correspondence. If, as was the case, the plaintiff's testimony is credited, there is more than ample evidence to support the judgment.
Comments on Farace v. Feher