legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Karlson
A jury convicted Daniel Kenric Karlson of second degree murder (Pen. Code,[1]
§ 187, subd. (a)); shooting a firearm in a grossly negligent manner (§ 246.3); being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)) and in possession of ammunition (§ 12316, subd. (b)(1)); and participation in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury found true allegations that as to the murder conviction, Karlson personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, causing death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)); and as to the negligent discharge of a firearm conviction, he personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). The court sentenced Karlson to a 44-year-four-month-to-life prison term.
Karlson challenges his conviction for actively participating in a criminal gang, alleging: (1) because the court erroneously denied his section 995 motion to dismiss the charge, extensive gang evidence was admitted against him thus violating his federal due process right to a fair trial; and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support that conviction. He further contends his conviction for discharging a firearm in a grossly negligent manner must be reversed because uncontroverted evidence showed he was acting in self-defense. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale