In re A.C.
T.G. (mother) challenges a juvenile court dispositional order placing her two children, A.C. (born Sept. 2000) and D.G. (born Mar. 2004) with their respective fathers and terminating jurisdiction. [1] To the extent mother attacks the juvenile court’s dispositional order, we conclude that the juvenile court did not err. However, as for mother’s complaint that the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) did not comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act’s (ICWA) notification requirements, we agree that notice was deficient. Those deficiencies do not compel reversal of the juvenile court’s order. Rather, pursuant to In re Brooke C. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 377, this matter is remanded for the limited purpose of allowing DCFS to provide proper ICWA notice.
Comments on In re A.C.