legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bracey
A decision regarding forcible rape after the trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5). Defendant contends that evidence linking him to the rape should have been suppressed because it was obtained from blood and saliva samples previously taken from him for DNA identification purposes, and the taking of the samples violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Court disagree and affirm because it is well settled that the taking of blood and saliva for DNA identification under California statutory law (Pen. Code, § 296 et seq.) does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale