Landin v. Barquero
Pedrina Barquero,[1] Jennifer Barquero, and Zoila Rose Vega,[2] alleging causes of action for injunctive relief (stay-away orders), intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and conspiracy, arising out of alleged harassment of plaintiffs by the defendants. The parties had a settlement conference in 2009, and the trial court put the terms on the record. However, when plaintiffs moved in 2012 to enforce the agreement, a dispute arose: defendants objected to enforcement on the ground that they never agreed to the specific term being enforced. That is, the agreement as announced by the court was for a different (greater) stay-away distance from the distance the parties had agreed to during settlement negotiations. The trial court determined that defendants had, in fact, agreed to the stay-away distance as announced by the court in 2009, and enforced the agreement as announced. Defendants now appeal. With a minor modification, we affirm.
Comments on Landin v. Barquero