In re S.R.
Father appeals from juvenile court jurisdiction and disposition orders, sustaining jurisdiction over his daughter, S.R. (born in 2004), and placing her with maternal grandparents. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (b).)[1] Father contends there was insufficient evidence supporting the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings, and the court erred in not placing S.R. with him, since he was a nonoffending, noncustodial parent. In addition, father asserts the visitation orders were deficient and S.R.’s attorney had a conflict of interest in representing S.R. and her older siblings.[2]
We conclude there was substantial evidence supporting the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders. We agree the visitation orders are improper because they do not specify the frequency or duration of S.R.’s visitation with father. Therefore, on remand, the juvenile court is directed to modify the visitation order on September 29, 2011, by specifying the frequency and duration of father’s visitation with S.R. We reject father’s other contentions and affirm the jurisdiction and disposition orders.
Comments on In re S.R.