legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lackyard
Defendant challenges Condition No. 15 of his probation—that he “reside at a residence approved by the probation officer and not move without prior consent of the probation officer”—on constitutional grounds. The trial court imposed this condition after granting defendant probation, in return for a guilty plea, and instead of imposing a three-year prison term, for entering the home of his ex-girlfriend, beating her bloody, snatching a necklace from her neck, and later violating the terms of an emergency restraining order. As discussed below, we conclude that the challenged probation condition should be changed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale