legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Robinson
Defendant Dwayne Lavell Robinson (appellant) admitted firing several gunshots into a group of people, killing one and injuring two others, but claimed he acted in self-defense. A jury disagreed, convicting him of second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) and assault with a firearm (id., § 245, subd. (a)(2)), and finding true firearms enhancements (id., §§ 12022.5, subd. (a), 12022.53, subds. (b)-(d), 12022.7, subd. (a)). He now appeals, contending (1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion for a new trial based on a newly-discovered scene in surveillance video footage (footage) of the shooting, (2) aspects of the prosecutor’s closing argument constituted prosecutorial misconduct, (3) the prosecution’s failure to disclose the scene from the footage was a Brady[1] violation, and (4) a ruling precluding the use of two witnesses’ prior convictions under Evidence Code section 1103 was prejudicial error. We reject appellant’s contentions and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale